Is it always beneficial to have a comprehensive troubleshooting plan covering all possible test cases from a given category?(1 point)

Responses

Yes, a troubleshooting plan needs to include all possible test cases, for a given category to meet industry standards.
Yes, a troubleshooting plan needs to include all possible test cases, for a given category to meet industry standards.

Yes, it is always beneficial to have a troubleshooting plan that covers all test cases from a given category.
Yes, it is always beneficial to have a troubleshooting plan that covers all test cases from a given category.

No, a troubleshooting plan covering all possible test cases from a given category could involve extra work, be redundant, and prove unproductive for improving the product.
No, a troubleshooting plan covering all possible test cases from a given category could involve extra work, be redundant, and prove unproductive for improving the product.

No, a troubleshooting plan does not ne

3 answers

cessarily need to cover all test cases, as focusing on the most common or critical issues can be more effective and efficient in real-world scenarios.

In summary, while a comprehensive troubleshooting plan can be beneficial, it is not always necessary or practical to cover every possible test case, as it might lead to unnecessary complexity and inefficiency. Prioritizing key issues may yield better results.

please pick an answer

No, a troubleshooting plan covering all possible test cases from a given category could involve extra work, be redundant, and prove unproductive for improving the product.