To determine how to modify the table so that it represents a function, we first need to analyze the input-output pairs given:
- Input: 1 → Output: 5
- Input: 2 → Output: 10
- Input: 3 → Output: 15
- Input: 2 → Output: 20 (duplicate input)
- Input: 1 → Output: 24 (duplicate input)
In the current set of pairs, the input "2" corresponds to both outputs "10" and "20," and the input "1" corresponds to both "5" and "24." Because a function cannot have more than one output for the same input, the table does not represent a function due to these duplicates.
Proposed Changes:
- Change the second output for input
2
from20
to12
. - Change the second output for input
1
from24
to6
.
Updated Table:
- Input: 1 → Output: 5
- Input: 2 → Output: 10
- Input: 3 → Output: 15
- Input: 2 → Output: 12 (changed from 20)
- Input: 1 → Output: 6 (changed from 24)
Explanation of Changes:
- For Input
2
: By changing the output to12
, we eliminate the ambiguity with the input2
having multiple outputs (10 and now 12) instead of 10 and 20. Now, the input2
only produces a single, unique output. - For Input
1
: By changing the output to6
, we resolve the same issue, ensuring that input1
maps to exactly one output (5 and now 6) instead of producing two different outputs (5 and 24).
Now, with unique outputs for each input, the relationship is a valid function as each input corresponds to exactly one output.