inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it

Question

counts on the emotions of the audience to come to a decision
comes to a general conclusion based on a specific observation
begins with a big clue hat is supported with specifics
includes support from unrelieable experts to make a point

Answer 1

While some of the statements in your answer are correct, it is important to note that inductive reasoning is not necessarily weaker than deductive reasoning. Here's a more accurate breakdown of the differences:

1. Inductive Reasoning: This is a form of reasoning where general conclusions are made based on specific observations. It moves from specific instances to a probable generalization. It relies on collecting evidence or observations to infer patterns and make generalizations. However, since inductive reasoning is based on probability rather than certainty, it is considered weaker than deductive reasoning.

2. Deductive Reasoning: This is a form of reasoning where specific conclusions are logically derived from general principles or premises. It moves from general principles to specific conclusions. Deductive reasoning aims to provide certainty by drawing logical conclusions based on established premises. It is often considered stronger than inductive reasoning because if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

To address some of the statements you made:
- Inductive reasoning does not necessarily rely on the emotions of the audience to come to a decision. It is based on logical analysis and the evaluation of evidence.
- Inductive reasoning does come to a general conclusion based on specific observations, as mentioned above.
- It is not accurate to say that inductive reasoning begins with a "big clue" supported by specifics. It involves collecting specific observations or evidence to draw a general conclusion.
- Inductive reasoning does not intentionally include support from unreliable experts to make a point. The reliability of the experts or sources is essential in evaluating the strength of the argument.

Overall, it is important to understand that inductive and deductive reasoning have their respective strengths and weaknesses, and their effectiveness depends on the context and the type of argument being made.