In your journal, you wrote about calculating the amount of concrete needed for a building project. You used the relationship between the volume of a prism and the volume of a pyramid.

Question

Pyramids have been used in building all over the world from ancient times in Egypt, Mexico, Italy, and Japan, to modern times in France and the United States. Use your research on a pyramid-shaped building and your knowledge of volume for a discussion giving consideration to purpose.

Begin the discussion by responding to the following prompt:

In your post, discuss the following with your peers:

Identify the chosen building. Why do you think the architect chose a pyramid for the shape of the building?
How would you design this building as a prism? Justify.
How would the change in shape affect the construction of the building?
How would the change in shape affect the use of the building? Use the concept of volume in this post.
Then read two of your peers’ posts. Respond to two of your peers:

For each post, explain why the pyramid or prism is a better shape for the building.
How would you improve on the identified pyramid-shaped building?
How would you improve on the alternate prism-shaped building? make an disuciuon

Answer 1

Building 1: The Louvre Pyramid in Paris, France

The architect, I.M. Pei, chose a pyramid for the shape of the Louvre Pyramid in order to modernize the traditional and classical architecture of the Louvre Museum. The pyramid shape serves as a contrast to the historic buildings surrounding it, while also acting as a focal point and entrance to the museum.

If I were to design the Louvre Pyramid as a prism, it would lose the iconic and striking shape that has made it a recognizable landmark in Paris. The design as a prism may not have the same visual impact and may blend in with the rest of the buildings in the vicinity.

The change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would greatly affect the construction of the building. The angles and dimensions of a pyramid require precise calculations and construction methods to ensure stability and visual appeal. A prism, on the other hand, may be simpler to construct but may not have the same architectural significance.

The change in shape from a pyramid to a prism would also affect the use of the building. The volume of the building would be reduced, potentially impacting the space available for exhibits and visitor circulation. The pyramid shape, with its sloping walls, creates a sense of grandeur and openness, while a prism may feel more enclosed and compact.

In response to my peers' posts:

I believe the Louvre Pyramid is a better shape for the building because of its iconic and visually striking design. The pyramid shape serves as a modern contrast to the historical buildings of the Louvre Museum, while also acting as a functional entrance and focal point.

To improve on the Louvre Pyramid, I would consider enhancing the interior space for exhibits and visitor circulation. The addition of more galleries or interactive spaces could enhance the visitor experience and make the building more functional.

If the Louvre Pyramid were to be redesigned as a prism, I would suggest incorporating unique design elements or materials to make it stand out amongst the surrounding buildings. Additionally, maximizing natural light and creating open spaces within the prism shape could enhance the building's functionality and aesthetic appeal.