To determine which set of numbers is arranged in ascending order, we first need to convert all the numbers to a consistent format, preferably decimal notation.
-
Set 1:
- \( 3.25 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00325 \)
- \( 2.25 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00225 \)
- \( 3.25 \times 10^{-4} = 0.000325 \)
- \( 1.25 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00125 \)
In ascending order: \( 0.000325, 0.00125, 0.00225, 0.00325 \) (not in ascending order).
-
Set 2:
- \( 0.00125 \)
- \( 0.00225 \)
- \( 0.000325 \)
- \( 0.00325 \)
In ascending order: \( 0.000325, 0.00125, 0.00225, 0.00325 \) (not in ascending order).
-
Set 3:
- \( 0.000325 \)
- \( 0.00225 \)
- \( 0.00125 \)
- \( 0.00325 \)
In ascending order: \( 0.000325, 0.00125, 0.00225, 0.00325 \) (not in ascending order).
-
Set 4:
- \( 3.25 \times 10^{-4} = 0.000325 \)
- \( 1.25 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00125 \)
- \( 2.25 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00225 \)
- \( 3.25 \times 10^{-3} = 0.00325 \)
In ascending order: \( 0.000325, 0.00125, 0.00225, 0.00325 \) (not in ascending order).
After checking all sets, none appear to be listed in ascending order. However, the correct ascending order of the values is \( 0.000325, 0.00125, 0.00225, 0.00325 \).
If we're looking for the set that correctly represents the values in ascending order, it seems there were some miscalculations or reordering. On further examination, the ascending order they align with is set 4, but the correct numerical sequence would be mentioned.
In conclusion, none of the sets are correctly arranged in ascending order.
1 answer