In the Supreme Court case United States v. Windsor, the court decided that the defense of marriage act violated which of the following?

A.) the comity clause
B.)the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
C.) *States rights*
D.) reasonable discrimination

Extradition, or the process of one state returning a person to the state where he is charged with a crime, is an example of which of the following?
A.) buying and selling property in different states
B.) *due process of the Fifth Amendment*
C.) full faith and credit
D.) privileges and immunities

Which would be an exception to comity clause?
A.) *Buying and selling property in other states*
B.) Charging more money for out-of-state collage tuition
C.) Freely traveling between states
D.) Recognizing all marriages from all states

*If anyone can help please let me know *-* *

9 answers

No thanks to anyone. The correct answers are:
1. C
2. B
3. C

Congress may, by general laws, prescribe the manner in which such acts may be proved and the effects of such laws. For example, before 2015, almost all states had laws that only allowed persons of the opposite sex to marry. Some states, however, wanted to allow marriage between persons of the same sex. In response, Congress passed what was called the Defense of Marriage Act (or DOMA) to handle this situation. This law stated that no state had to recognize the marriage between persons of the same sex, unless they wanted to do so. However, in the 2013 case of United States v. Windsor, the Supreme Court declared section 3 of DOMA unconstitutional. The ruling stated that it violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In 2015, in the case of Obergfell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment requires that all U.S. states must recognize same-sex marriages.
Divorce, the legal termination of marriage, has also created some problems under the full faith and credit clause. Some states have challenged what they consider the quickie divorce laws of other states. The Supreme Court ruled in some cases before it that both husband and wife must be allowed to contest such divorces before they can be given full faith and credit.
Full faith and credit covers criminal acts. This is covered by a process the Constitution calls extradition. This process covers situations where a person is charged with a crime in one state and flees to another state to escape punishment. Most of the time, states will turn over a person to the state requesting the return. Often, the accused may demand a public hearing on the matter. The accused may choose to waive extradition, and not fight the return. In rare instances, the governor of the state may refuse to send the fugitive back.
Citizens of each state are also guaranteed all the privileges (rights that a person qualifies for) and immunities (protections) to which any citizen is entitled. This is known as the comity clause. Comity means friendship. Citizens of the United States have the privilege to travel freely from state to state. You do not need an internal passport. Each American citizen has the right to buy and sell property in other states.
States do have the power to make reasonable (or rational) discrimination, favoring the citizens of their own state over those of another state. For example, states often charge out-of-state tuition to students from other states desiring to attend college in their state. This is considered a reasonable form of discrimination because the out-of-state student’s family has not paid state taxes for support of the public colleges.

My explanation. Now have a good day.

zapper is wrong i got 1/3 it's
1.B
2.C
3.B

Madoria is right

Yep 100 %

madoria is correct! Thanks a lot! 😊😊😊😊

I came in clutch

madoria is right

THank you

thanks @madoria