In order to provide a proper justification for the statement in Step 4, we need the specific statement and the context in which it is being used or applied. Without that information, it is difficult to determine which particular reason, such as SAS (Side-Angle-Side), SSS (Side-Side-Side), ASA (Angle-Side-Angle), or AAS (Angle-Angle-Side), would justify the statement.
Each of these reasons is a postulate or theorem used in geometry to prove that two triangles are congruent. The choice of which reason to use would depend on the specific information given about the triangles in the problem. For example, if we are given two pairs of corresponding sides and a pair of corresponding angles that are congruent, we could use the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) postulate to prove congruence.
In general, the choice of reason depends on the information provided and the specific congruence postulates or theorems that are applicable in that particular situation.
in the previous question what reason justifies th e statement in Step 4? SAS,SSS,ASA,AAS
1 answer
1 answer