To balance the modified equation where you have 3H₂ instead of 2H₂, the equation would look like this:
3H₂ + 1.5O₂ → 3H₂O
However, since we typically do not use fractional coefficients in a balanced chemical equation, we can multiply the entire equation by 2 for clarity:
6H₂ + 3O₂ → 6H₂O
Now, let's evaluate the statements given:
-
"Each oxygen molecule will combine with 2 hydrogen molecules with no leftover molecules." - This is not entirely accurate as, in this case, each O₂ molecule actually combines with 4 H₂ molecules if we look at the entire balanced equation (3O₂ combines with 6 H₂).
-
"The equation will produce three molecules of water." - This is also incorrect as the balanced equation produces 6 H₂O molecules.
-
"The result of the equation will be the same." - This is unclear without context. The modified equation would produce more water compared to the original equation, so this statement can be considered incorrect.
-
"It is not possible to produce water without leftover molecules." - This could be seen as incorrect in certain scenarios, as it is indeed possible to achieve complete reactions under ideal conditions.
Based on the analysis, the most accurate statement after changing 2H₂ to 3H₂ and balancing is that the original equation will produce 6 H₂O molecules, not just 3. None of the provided statements are perfectly correct, but the second option regarding producing three molecules of water is the most directly misleading, as it incorrectly suggests the outcome of the reaction.
Therefore, if I had to select a "most correct" answer based on the analysis despite shortcomings in all options, I'd point out that "The equation will produce three molecules of water" is incorrect and thus can be favored in your query for indicating how they differ.