In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the Justices defended the students' right to wear armbands to protest the Vietnam War primarily by stating that the armbands did not interfere with any students' learning. This established the principle that students do not lose their First Amendment rights to free speech when they enter a school.
In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines, how did the Justices defend the armbands students wore in public school to protest the Vietnam War?(1 point)
Responses
The armbands did not interfere with any students' learning.
The armbands did not interfere with any students' learning.
The armbands were small enough that no one could see them.
The armbands were small enough that no one could see them.
The armbands looked similar to the students' uniforms.
The armbands looked similar to the students' uniforms.
The armbands were only worn by students for 30 minutes a day.
1 answer