In the case of Roe v. Wade, what answer explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted?(1 point) Responses The right to privacy implied by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual. The right to privacy implied by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual. The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The right for a woman to choose is not protected under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. Individuals are protected against state laws that regulate interracial marriage under the Fourteenth Amendment. An individual right listed in the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution is the right to choose a partner for marriage.
1 answer
The correct response that explains why judicial review at the Supreme Court level was warranted in the case of Roe v. Wade is:
The right to privacy implied by the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution protected the individual.
This response reflects the Supreme Court's reasoning that the right to privacy, derived from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, extends to a woman's right to choose to have an abortion.
