In the case of Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court used the Fourteenth Amendment to justify applying the Fourth Amendment to the states. The Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in court, is applicable to state courts through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which amendment was used by the Supreme Court to justify applying the Fourth Amendment to the states?(1 point)Responsesthe Second Amendmentthe Second Amendmentthe Sixth Amendmentthe Sixth Amendmentthe Fourteenth Amendmentthe Fourteenth Amendmentthe Fifth Amendment
1 answer