In The Call of the Wild, this new theory of "Survival of the Kindness" proposed by Dr. Kukk may not have worked for Buck. The novel explores the harsh realities of the wilderness and the survival instincts necessary for survival in such an environment.
Buck, the protagonist, undergoes a transformation from a domesticated dog to a wild and instinctual creature. He learns to adapt and survive in the brutal conditions he is forced into. Throughout the novel, Buck faces numerous challenges where the survival of the fittest mentality is paramount.
For example, when Buck becomes a member of a dog team, he experiences intense competition and must fight his way to assert his dominance. In these situations, displaying kindness or compassion towards his fellow dogs would not have been advantageous for his own survival. Instead, Buck relies on his physical strength and cunningness to establish his position in the pack.
Furthermore, the novel emphasizes the brutality and the law of the club in the wild. It demonstrates that only the strongest and most dominant survive. The harshness of the environment demands a focus on self-preservation rather than kindness. The portrayal of the sled dogs, who often resort to violence to establish dominance, reflects this survival of the fittest mentality.
Therefore, in the context of The Call of the Wild, Dr. Kukk's theory of "Survival of the Kindness" would not have worked for Buck. His survival relies on his ability to adapt, compete, and assert dominance in a merciless wilderness. The novel emphasizes the importance of individual strength and self-preservation, making Buck's journey incompatible with the principles of compassion and kindness.
In The Call of the Wild, would this new theory have worked for Buck? Why or why not? (Use examples from the novel as support.) In today's society, the theory that I think is more effective is the "Survival of the kindness" by Dr. Kukk. Dr. Kukk's article "Survival of the Fittest Has Evolved: Try Survival of the Kindest" shows how today's society benefits more from being compassionate towards people gets them a lot further than trying to fight for survival and worrying about oneself. Being compassionate towards others helps people have more of a "village" than them just being alone. " Those communities which included the greatest number of the most sympathetic members would flourish best," was stated by Darwin. Survival of the kindness can not only help others but also ensures that you get help as well. Where survival of the fittest can make someone seem selfish and not seem like they care about anyone else.
1 answer