The struggle for independence that the Filipinos experienced under both Spanish and U.S. control shares similarities but also shows significant differences in terms of context, leadership, approaches to resistance, and outcomes.
Similarities
-
Desire for Independence: In both cases, Filipinos sought to free themselves from foreign colonization. Under Spanish rule, their primary motivation was to end centuries of exploitation and oppression. Similarly, after the U.S. takeover, Filipinos aimed to secure their sovereignty and self-determination.
-
Nationalist Leadership: In both struggles, Filipino leaders emerged to rally people for independence. Emilio Aguinaldo was a key figure in both conflicts, initially fighting against the Spanish and later leading the resistance against the American forces.
-
Violent Resistance and Repression: The efforts to achieve independence in both instances led to violent confrontations. The Filipinos faced brutal repression from both Spanish and American forces, resulting in significant casualties and suffering among the civilian population.
-
Involvement of External Powers: Both struggles involved significant international dynamics. The Spanish-American War, which brought the U.S. into the Philippines, was influenced by broader imperialist ambitions. As the Filipinos sought independence, they found themselves caught between two imperial powers.
Differences
-
Nature of Colonial Rule: Spanish rule in the Philippines was characterized by direct colonialism with a focus on religious conversion, forced labor, and land dispossession. The U.S. approach included promises of eventual self-government and modernization, although it primarily aimed to maintain control and exploit resources.
-
International Support/Distraction: During their struggle against the Spanish, Filipinos received some international sympathy, particularly from other colonial and revolutionary movements. In contrast, when fighting against American rule, the Filipinos found themselves isolated, as the U.S. was seen as a liberator from Spain, complicating external support.
-
Scale and Duration of the Struggle: The Filipino struggle against Spanish rule involved several localized revolts that culminated in the Philippine Revolution (1896-1898). The fight against U.S. control escalated into a protracted conflict, known as the Philippine-American War (1899-1902), which lasted longer and resulted in a more organized military response from both sides.
-
Resulting Policies and Governance: Post-Spanish rule, Aguinaldo briefly declared independence before U.S. military intervention. Under U.S. control, the American government established a nonmilitary governance structure aiming to "prepare Filipinos for independence," but this was perceived as mere pretense by many Filipinos. The lasting colonial dynamic under U.S. rule was different from the immediate fight for independence from Spain, leading to a delayed path to actual independence in 1946.
-
American Ideological Framework: With the U.S. rule, there was an ideological justification grounded in manifest destiny, the belief in American exceptionalism, and the notion of the "white man's burden," which framed the U.S. presence as a civilizing mission rather than merely colonial domination—an argument absent in the struggle under Spanish rule.
In conclusion, while both struggles reflected a deep-rooted desire for independence and faced similar challenges of oppression and violence, the context, nature of colonialism, international dynamics, and ideological justifications set apart the Filipino fight for independence under Spanish rule from that under American control.