In an essay of 400-500 words, analyze how the language and literary styles used by William Shakespeare in “Sonnet 18” and Nikolai Gogol in “The Nose” contribute to this metacognitive nature. Include in your discussion an evaluation of the effects of similes, metaphors, analogies, and other figurative language; and, as able, include mention of how each work’s historical or cultural setting impacts the use of language.

Claim: Write your answer to the essay prompt (remember to include the name of the author and title of the literature you are going to discuss). You will copy and paste this sentence in the claim box on the next page.

Paragraph 1: Identify one reason that your claim is true.

Paragraph 2: Identify a second reason that your claim is true.

Paragraph 3: Identify a third reason that your claim is true.

Conclusion Paragraph: Restate the claim you made above in box A in a different way.

Intro Paragraph:

It’s okay to write or change part of this once you have written the majority of your paper.

Hook (1-2 sentences): (a quote from “Sonnet 18” and “The Nose”; connection to how the language and literary style contribute to the metacognitive nature; or a statement that will capture the reader’s attention relevant to the topic)

Background Information (1-2 sentences): (Why is it important to understand how the language and literary style contribute to the metacognitive nature?)

Context (1-2 sentences): (information as it relates to the prompt and what you will discuss)

Claim: Copy and paste the sentence that you wrote in the claim box on page 1 here.

Paragraph 1
Topic Sentence: You can take this from the paragraph 1 box on page 1

Quote #1 from the text: (This quote should be evidence from the text to support this paragraph’s topic sentence)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about what the quote says)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about how the text supports the topic)

Quote #2 from the text: (This quote should be evidence from the text to support this paragraph’s topic sentence)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about what the quote says)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about how the text supports the topic)

Concluding Sentence: Final statement to sum up this paragraph and transition to the next paragraph.

Paragraph 2
Topic Sentence: You can take this from the paragraph 2 box on page 1

Quote #3 from the text: (This quote should be evidence from the text to support this paragraph’s topic sentence)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about what the quote says)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about how the text supports the topic)

Quote #4 from the text: (This quote should be evidence from the text to support this paragraph’s topic sentence)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about what the quote says)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about how the text supports the topic)

Concluding Sentence: Final statement to sum up this paragraph and transition to the next paragraph.

Paragraph 3
Topic Sentence: You can take this from the paragraph 3 box on page 1

Quote #5 from the text: (This quote should be evidence from the text to support this paragraph’s topic sentence)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about what the quote says)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about how the text supports the topic)

Quote #6 from the text: (This quote should be evidence from the text to support this paragraph’s topic sentence)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about what the quote says)


Commentary: (explanation in your own words about how the text supports the topic)

Concluding Sentence: Final statement to sum up this paragraph and transition to the next paragraph.

Conclusion Paragraph

Restate the main points of your essay: bring together the idea/s of your topic sentences

Restate your claim in a different way:

FInal statement about why your claim is important: (now that we know, what’s next?)

Check My Work Link:

Final Draft of Essay (400-500 words):

Begin with the Intro Paragraph boxes. Copy over the information one box at a time. Then revise.

1 answer

Intro Paragraph:

"Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?" and "What is the nose to do with me?" both reflect the metacognitive dimensions of art, emphasizing the complexities of self-awareness and identity. These literary landmarks—William Shakespeare’s "Sonnet 18" and Nikolai Gogol’s "The Nose"—embody profound explorations of the human experience through their language and stylistic choices. Understanding how these elements contribute to their metacognitive nature reveals not only literary brilliance but also the cultural contexts in which they were created. Shakespeare, writing during the English Renaissance, and Gogol, emerging from 19th-century Russian literature, used figurative language and unique narratives to probe deeper than surface meanings, inviting readers to reflect on their own perceptions of beauty, identity, and humanity.

Claim: The language and literary styles used by William Shakespeare in “Sonnet 18” and Nikolai Gogol in “The Nose” contribute to their metacognitive nature by employing intricate figurative language that invites self-reflection and cultural critique.

Paragraph 1

Topic Sentence: The use of similes and metaphors in both texts creates layers of meaning that prompt readers to reflect on beauty and identity.

Quote #1 from the text: In "Sonnet 18," Shakespeare writes, “Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May.”

Commentary: This simile compares the winds to a destructive force impacting the beauty of spring, revealing how external factors can affect perception.

Commentary: Shakespeare’s choice of metaphor illustrates the ephemeral nature of beauty and invites readers to contemplate how their environment shapes their self-image and understanding of beauty.

Quote #2 from the text: Conversely, in "The Nose," Gogol presents the protagonist’s nakedness as he interacts with his detached nose, stating, “The nose had taken on a life of its own.”

Commentary: This metaphor emphasizes the absurdity of identity; the character's self-image is fragmented, represented by his removed nose acting independently.

Commentary: Gogol’s work challenges readers to reflect on the absurdities of societal norms and personal identity, mirroring the struggles within themselves.

Concluding Sentence: Through the use of similes and metaphors, both Shakespeare and Gogol deepen their texts' thematic explorations, encouraging introspection about identity and beauty.

Paragraph 2

Topic Sentence: The narrative styles of both works further enhance their metacognitive nature by exploring the subjective experiences of their characters.

Quote #3 from the text: Shakespeare employs a consistent iambic pentameter in “Sonnet 18,” which creates a rhythmic flow that mirrors the ongoing contemplation of love and beauty.

Commentary: This structure imbues the sonnet with a musical quality, inviting readers to engage with the poet's meditative journey.

Commentary: The rhythm of the sonnet symbolizes the complexities of human emotion, encouraging readers to reflect on their own experiences with love and admiration.

Quote #4 from the text: In contrast, Gogol’s use of absurdism in "The Nose" creates a surreal narrative structure that mimics the character’s disorientation.

Commentary: The erratic shifts in narrative style reflect the chaos of identity crises, as the protagonist grapples with the loss of his nose and what it signifies.

Commentary: This narrative style forces readers to question societal standards, pushing them to reflect on how materiality and appearance shape their understanding of the self.

Concluding Sentence: The differing narrative techniques employed by Shakespeare and Gogol enrich the reader’s metacognitive engagement, prompting a deeper inquiry into identity’s intricacies.

Paragraph 3

Topic Sentence: Lastly, the cultural contexts in which these works were created enrich their figurative languages and their metacognitive layers.

Quote #5 from the text: Shakespeare’s references to nature in "Sonnet 18" are deeply rooted in the Renaissance's idealization of beauty, as he likens his beloved to an everlasting summer.

Commentary: This reflects the era's preoccupation with the philosophical understanding of beauty and its transient nature.

Commentary: Shakespeare’s utilization of cultural ideals compels readers to confront their societal notions about beauty and love’s permanence versus impermanence.

Quote #6 from the text: Gogol, on the other hand, critiques the Russian bourgeoisie through the absurdity of "The Nose," capturing the cultural anxieties of 19th-century Russia regarding class and identity.

Commentary: The grotesque detachment of the nose serves as a symbol of societal expectations and pressures, emphasizing the character’s alienation in a rapidly modernizing society.

Commentary: This cultural lens invites readers to critically examine their responses to societal norms and the ways these norms impact their self-perception.

Concluding Sentence: By situating the use of language within their cultural contexts, both authors foster a critical engagement with identity and societal critiques.

Conclusion Paragraph

The exploration of language and literary styles in Shakespeare's "Sonnet 18" and Gogol's "The Nose" demonstrates a rich metacognitive engagement with themes of beauty and identity. By employing similes, metaphors, and distinctive narrative techniques, both authors invite readers to reflect on their own experiences and recognize the fluidity of identity shaped by social and cultural forces. Ultimately, understanding these dynamics sheds light on the enduring human condition, prompting contemporary readers to consider their interpretations of beauty, identity, and societal expectations in an ever-evolving world.