In an effort to convince his state government to vote on a measure that would reduce the size of payments to individual welfare recipients, a politician is stating that public welfare payments comprised 27% of all state government spending in 2017. What is the issue with the politician's statement? Explain.(1 point) Responses Although the statement is technically true, only a small portion of that 27% was actually paid to individual welfare recipients. Nearly all of those payments went to local governments for a variety of welfare related reasons, of which only a small proportion was individual welfare payments. Although the statement is technically true, only a small portion of that 27% was actually paid to individual welfare recipients. Nearly all of those payments went to local governments for a variety of welfare related reasons, of which only a small proportion was individual welfare payments. Although the statement is technically true, only a small portion of that 27% was actually paid to individual welfare recipients. Some of that 27% was paid to vendors of medical services and nearly all of it was spent on the operational costs of organizations providing public services. Although the statement is technically true, only a small portion of that 27% was actually paid to individual welfare recipients. Some of that 27% was paid to vendors of medical services and nearly all of it was spent on the operational costs of organizations providing public services. The statement made by the politician is false. Public welfare payments only comprised 0.27% (not 27%) of statement government spending in 2017. The statement made by the politician is false. Public welfare payments only comprised 0.27% (not 27%) of statement government spending in 2017. The statement made by the politician is false. Public welfare payments only comprised 2.7% (not 27%) of statement government spending in 2017. The statement made by the politician is false. Public welfare payments only comprised 2.7% (not 27%) of statement government spending in 2017. Skip to navigation

1 answer

The issue with the politician's statement is that they are exaggerating the percentage of state government spending that goes towards individual welfare payments. While it is true that public welfare payments comprised 27% of all state government spending, only a small portion of that 27% was actually paid to individual welfare recipients. The majority of the payments went to local governments for various welfare-related reasons, and some of it was spent on vendors of medical services and operational costs of organizations providing public services. Therefore, the politician's statement is misleading and does not accurately represent how much of the state budget is allocated to individual welfare recipients.