In a paragraph of 5–7 sentences, describe another nation’s involvement in the conflict and critique their actions. Are their actions justified or unjustified? Legal or illegal? Moral or immoral? How does the evidence in your sources support your critique?

Question

Examples: Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia, United States, Japan
put it in your own words and make it sound like a 9th grader

Answer 1

One nation that has been involved in the conflict is the United States. The U.S. has participated both militarily and politically, often stepping in to support certain countries in the region. Critics argue that this involvement is unjustified because it can escalate tensions rather than promote peace. For instance, the U.S. has supplied weapons and military training, which some people see as illegal under international law, as it can lead to civilian harm and increase violence. Additionally, many believe that these actions are immoral since they put the lives of innocent people at risk for political motives. Sources indicate that, despite claiming to promote democracy and stability, the U.S. actions have sometimes led to greater instability and suffering. Overall, while the U.S. may have had good intentions, many argue that the consequences of their involvement have been harmful and problematic.