In a paragraph of 5–7 sentences, choose two of the nations involved in the conflict and critique their actions. Are their actions justified or unjustified? Legal or illegal? Moral or immoral? How does the evidence in your sources support your critique?

Answer 1

In the conflict between Israel and Palestine, both nations have engaged in actions that can be critiqued from various perspectives. Israel's actions have faced widespread criticism for the continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied territory, which is considered illegal under international law. This expansion undermines the potential for a two-state solution and exacerbates tensions in the region. Additionally, Israel's use of force against Palestinian civilians during protests and military operations has been heavily condemned by human rights groups as unjustified and excessive.

On the other hand, Palestine's actions have also faced scrutiny and debate. Some argue that their leadership's support for armed resistance, including rocket attacks targeting Israeli civilians, is unjustified as it only escalates the conflict and contributes to further suffering for both sides. While these actions can be seen as morally questionable, particularly when they harm non-combatants, others suggest that they may be perceived as acts of self-defense against a much stronger and better-equipped military force.

The evidence from various sources supports these critiques. Regarding Israeli settlements, numerous UN resolutions and the International Court of Justice have deemed them illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention. The expanding settlements make it increasingly difficult to establish a viable and contiguous Palestinian state. Moreover, reports from human rights organizations consistently document instances of Israeli forces using disproportionate force against Palestinian civilians, resulting in high casualties and arbitrary detentions.

Conversely, the moral and legal justification for Palestine's actions is more contentious. While some argue that self-defense is a legitimate response to Israeli occupation and blockade, others believe that targeting civilians is inherently immoral and illegal. Moreover, the Palestinian leadership faces further critique for their failure to promote non-violent resistance strategies and seek peaceful negotiations to achieve their national aspirations.

In summary, both Israel and Palestine have engaged in actions that are subject to critique. Israel's expansion of settlements and use of disproportionate force against Palestinian civilians are widely considered as unjustified, illegal, and morally wrong. While Palestine's armed resistance may be seen as a response to Israeli oppression, some view their actions as unjustified, illegal, and immoral due to their impact on innocent civilians.