in a one paragraph response, compare the two opposing American opinions regarding the expansion of the United States near the turn of the twentieth century. In your analysis, identify at least two ways in which the United States benefited from its imperialist foreign policy as well as two drawbacks to expansion. (Hint... this question is referring to the imperialist vs. anti-imperialist debate referenced throughout the unit.)

Answer 1

At the turn of the twentieth century, American opinions on expansion were sharply divided between imperialists, who advocated for the acquisition of new territories to enhance American influence and economic power, and anti-imperialists, who opposed such actions on moral and constitutional grounds. Proponents of imperialism argued that it provided the United States with access to new markets and resources necessary for industrial growth, as well as a strategic foothold in global affairs, exemplified by the acquisition of territories like Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines following the Spanish-American War. Conversely, opponents highlighted the ethical concerns of subjugating other nations and the potential for entanglement in foreign conflicts, fearing that imperialist practices contradicted American ideals of self-determination and democracy. Additionally, critics pointed to the financial and military burdens of maintaining overseas colonies, which could divert attention and resources from domestic issues.