In a one paragraph response, compare the two opposing American opinions regarding the expansion of the United States near the turn of the twentieth century. In your analysis, identify at least two ways in which the United States benefited from its imperialist foreign policy as well as two drawbacks to expansion. (Hint... this question is referring to the imperialist vs. anti-imperialist debate referenced throughout the unit.)(5 points)

Answer 1

Near the turn of the twentieth century, American opinions on imperialism were sharply divided. Proponents of imperialism argued that expanding the United States through territories like the Philippines and Puerto Rico would strengthen the nation's economic power and enhance its global influence by providing new markets and resources. Additionally, they believed such expansion would fulfill the nation’s perceived duty to civilize and uplift "lesser" cultures. Conversely, anti-imperialists raised concerns about the ethical implications of subjugating other nations and the potential dilution of American democratic values. They feared that imperialism would entangle the U.S. in foreign conflicts and foster militarism, detracting from domestic issues. Thus, while imperialist policies brought economic benefits and increased global standing, drawbacks included moral dilemmas and the risk of international entanglements that could hinder the nation's core democratic principles.