In 4 sentences, evaluate how the international response to the Rwandan Genocide and the September 11, 2001, attacks differ. Provide 2–3 examples to compare and contrast the two events.

Answer 1

The international response to the Rwandan Genocide was widely criticized for being slow and ineffective, with many countries failing to intervene to prevent the mass killings. In contrast, the international response to the September 11, 2001, attacks was swift and coordinated, with countries around the world offering support and solidarity to the United States. For example, after the Rwandan Genocide, the United Nations was criticized for its lack of action, whereas after 9/11, NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time in its history, declaring an attack on one member to be an attack on all. Additionally, the US-led coalition swiftly launched military action in Afghanistan in response to the 9/11 attacks, while no such intervention occurred in Rwanda to stop the genocide.