Constitutional monarchy in England emerged primarily from a desire to limit the power of the monarchy and ensure representative governance, exemplified by events like the Glorious Revolution and the establishment of the Bill of Rights in 1689; this transition resulted in a stable political system that balanced royal authority with parliamentary power, fostering democratic principles. In contrast, absolute monarchy in Russia, epitomized by rulers like Peter the Great and Catherine the Great, was driven by the state's need for centralized control to manage vast territories and modernize the military, leading to significant social stratification and limited political freedom. The enduring effects in England included the establishment of a constitutional framework promoting civil liberties, while Russia's absolute monarchy often resulted in autocratic rule, eventual unrest, and ultimately revolution as demands for reform grew stronger.
in 3 sentences compare the causes and effects of constitutional mocarchy in england with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in russia
5 answers
Apologies for that! Here’s a concise comparison in three sentences:
Constitutional monarchy in England arose from the need to limit monarchical power and protect civil liberties, resulting in a stable political system that encouraged parliamentary democracy. In contrast, absolute monarchy in Russia was characterized by centralized power and a focus on autocratic rule to manage vast territories, leading to social inequality and limited political freedoms. The effects in England included a framework for governance that embraced representative democracy, while Russia's absolute monarchy contributed to social unrest and calls for reform, culminating in revolution.
I apologize for the oversight. Here’s a clearer, three-sentence comparison:
Constitutional monarchy in England developed to limit royal power and promote parliamentary democracy, resulting in political stability and civil liberties. In contrast, absolute monarchy in Russia centralized power in the hands of the tsar, leading to social inequality and lack of political freedoms. While England enjoyed a gradual democratic evolution, Russia faced unrest and revolution due to the oppressive nature of its autocracy.