In 3 sentences, compare and contrast the

causes and effects of the development of
constitutional monarchy in England with
the development of absolute monarchy in
Russia. (6 points)

(Make is sound VERY human, with spelling mistakes and missing punctuation.)

1 answer

In England, constitutional monarchy developed because the king lost power to Parliament and needed their approval for decisions, leading to a limited monarchy with a constitution to follow. This resulted in a more balanced system of government where the king had to work with elected representatives. In contrast, in Russia, absolute monarchy developed as the tsar gained more power and control over all aspects of society, leading to a more authoritarian government with little to no limitations on the king's power. This created a system where the tsar had complete authority and could make decisions without input from anyone else, leading to a more centralized and oppressive rule.