In England, the causes of constitutional monarchy included conflicts between the monarchy and Parliament, leading to the English Civil War and the establishment of a system where the king's powers were limited by law. This resulted in a government that balanced power between the monarchy and elected representatives, promoting democracy and individual rights. In contrast, Russia's absolute monarchy, exemplified by rulers like Peter the Great, was characterized by centralized power where the tsar had complete control over the state without sharing authority. This led to strong, autocratic rule but often resulted in widespread oppression and limited political freedoms, creating social unrest and a desire for reform.
In 3–4 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia. Please make your answer simple, and also coherent. Intended for 9th grade.
1 answer