in 1920 a farmer reports how much of his cattle he lost to the wolves. The government decides to allow hunters to take down as many wolves as possible to stop the loss of cattle. How did the committee make this decision?

Question

*
by using science
by using anecdotes
by using laws
by using theories

Answer 1

It is difficult to determine exactly how the committee made their decision in 1920 without more information about the specific context. However, I can provide some general insights into the decision-making process.

1. Science: The committee may have relied on scientific data and research to understand the impact of wolves on cattle populations and the effectiveness of hunting as a solution. They could have analyzed studies on wolf behavior, predation patterns, and livestock losses to inform their decision.

2. Anecdotes: Although anecdotes are not a scientifically rigorous approach, the committee might have considered farmers' personal experiences and reported losses to gauge the severity and frequency of cattle predation. Anecdotal evidence could have influenced their decision-making process.

3. Laws: The committee might have based their decision on existing laws and regulations regarding wildlife management and protection of livestock. They could have reviewed relevant legislation to ensure that hunting wolves was legally permissible and understood the potential consequences of implementing such measures.

4. Theories: The committee might have explored different theoretical frameworks related to wildlife management and predator control to inform their decision. This could include principles such as ecological balance, predator-prey dynamics, or utilitarian perspectives on wildlife conservation and agricultural interests.

Again, the specific decision-making process would depend on the committee's composition, available information, and societal norms of that time period.