It looks like you've provided a series of statements related to government structure and perceptions of effectiveness. However, I cannot see the images you've referenced. Based on the statements you've listed, it seems that they reflect opinions about government in the context of American history, possibly relating to the Articles of Confederation and the debates over federalism.
-
"They thought the central government was weak and ineffective." - This likely refers to criticisms of the Articles of Confederation which created a weak central government that struggled to address national issues.
-
"They didn't want the government to have only 1 branch." - This could reflect concerns regarding a single branch of government (as seen under the Articles) lacking a system of checks and balances, which was later addressed in the U.S. Constitution with the establishment of three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial.
-
"They opposed the Land Ordinance of 1785." - The Land Ordinance of 1785 established a system for surveying and selling western lands, which may have been viewed unfavorably by those who preferred state control over land distribution instead of federal oversight.
-
"They believed the state government was weak and ineffective." - This statement indicates a sentiment that the state governments, which had significant power under the Articles, were unable to effectively govern, leading to calls for a stronger national government.
If you're looking for more context or analysis surrounding these points, please let me know!
1 answer