Make sure you're clear on all your terminology. Read several definitions of each so you are more likely to get the whole picture.
http://www.google.com/search?q=trickle+down+theory+definition&oq=trickle+down&aqs=chrome.3.69i57j0l5.7036j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8
http://www.google.com/search?q=income+inequality+definition&oq=income+inequality&aqs=chrome.4.69i57j0l5.18737j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8
http://www.google.com/search?q=middle+class+out+economics&oq=middle+out+ec&aqs=chrome.5.69i57j0l5.13530j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=119&ie=UTF-8#q=middle+out+economics
I'm writing a synthesis paper about why we should utilize middle-out economics (basically economics that focus on the middle class)
I'm very new to the topic so I don't want to spread myself too thin or dive into something I don't know too much about.
I'm planning on doing three paragraphs.
#1: Trickle-down Economics/ why it doesn't work
#2: Middle-out Economics in the past / why it worked
#3: Benefits for the future
My main problem is that my second paragraph talks a lot about income inequality. If I make it a separate point, I feel like there wouldn't be enough information and if I replace #2's point, then the paper won't be cohesive.
Do you have any tips on structuring this paper? Thank you!
1 answer
1 answer