The myth of King Arthur revolves around themes such as chivalry, justice, honor, and the quest for the Holy Grail. King Arthur is often viewed as an ideal ruler, who brings peace and prosperity to his people while fighting against injustice and tyranny. His knights of the Round Table embody the concept of chivalry and work for the betterment of society.
On the other hand, Sundiata (or Sundjata), also known as the Lion King of Mali, is a historical figure who founded the Mali Empire and united different tribes under his rule. He overcame adversity, notably his physical disability, and led his people to prosperity through trade, agriculture, and wise governance. The story of Sundiata emphasizes the importance of unity, determination, and the power of individuals to overcome challenges.
In today's world, issues such as social justice, equality, unity, and sustainable development are highly relevant. Between these two myths, Sundiata's story might be more relevant to today's context as it highlights the importance of overcoming physical and societal limitations, and the significance of unity and good governance in building a prosperous nation. Additionally, his focus on trade and economic development provides a more grounded approach to leadership, whereas King Arthur's legend, while embodying important virtues, is often more focused on the symbolic and romantic aspects of chivalry and heroism.
I'm supposed to decide which is more relevant, message wise, to today - the myth of King Arthur or Sundiata. Any ideas?
First I would decide what the purpose of those two famous "stories" is. What difference did those men make?
Then, think of the problems of today...what difference would either of those men make if placed in a country today? Then you can choose which hero would be more relevant and why.
1 answer
2 answers