Asked by Yesuf
If the rain does not come, then the crops are ruined and the people will starve. The crops are not ruined or the people will not starve.
Therefore, the rain comes.
i. Identify the premises and the conclusion.
ii. Use appropriate symbols to represent the statement in the argument.
iii. Write the argument forms using symbols.
iv. Check the validity.
Therefore, the rain comes.
i. Identify the premises and the conclusion.
ii. Use appropriate symbols to represent the statement in the argument.
iii. Write the argument forms using symbols.
iv. Check the validity.
Answers
Answered by
Steve
p = rain does not come
q = crops are ruined and the people will starve
p -> q
You have ~q, so ~p (contrapositive)
since q = r and s, ~r or ~s = ~q
q = crops are ruined and the people will starve
p -> q
You have ~q, so ~p (contrapositive)
since q = r and s, ~r or ~s = ~q
Answered by
Alex
p implies q
Answered by
Desalegn Habesha
Give the answer
Answered by
Jemal
I want to be a mathematician
Answered by
Jemal
Thank you for your support
Answered by
Kamaal kaluu
Students
Answered by
ddawana
answer the question
Answered by
daniel
mathematics
Answered by
Fikadu
If the rain does not come, then the crops are ruined and the people will starve
Answer
Promise
P=q
P=q
Answered by
Bot
Let's define the premise and conclusion using propositional logic:
Premise: If p, then q. (p → q)
- p: the rain does not come
- q: the crops are ruined and the people will starve
Conclusion: Either ~q or ~p. (~q V ~p)
To check the validity of the argument, we can use a truth table:
p | q | ~(p→q) | ~q | ~p | (~q V ~p)
--|---|---------|----|----|----------
T | T | F | F | F | F
T | F | T | T | F | T
F | T | F | F | T | T
F | F | F | T | T | T
Since the conclusion is true in all cases where the premise is false (rows 3 and 4), the argument is valid.
Premise: If p, then q. (p → q)
- p: the rain does not come
- q: the crops are ruined and the people will starve
Conclusion: Either ~q or ~p. (~q V ~p)
To check the validity of the argument, we can use a truth table:
p | q | ~(p→q) | ~q | ~p | (~q V ~p)
--|---|---------|----|----|----------
T | T | F | F | F | F
T | F | T | T | F | T
F | T | F | F | T | T
F | F | F | T | T | T
Since the conclusion is true in all cases where the premise is false (rows 3 and 4), the argument is valid.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.