If someone were to investigate a historical event, what advantage would using a primary source give them?(1 point) Responses Primary sources are subjected to peer review. Primary sources are subjected to peer review. Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event. Primary sources provide an eyewitness account of an event. Primary sources are the most accurate. Primary sources are the most accurate. Primary sources never conflict with one another.

Answer 1

Using a primary source to investigate a historical event provides the advantage of offering an eyewitness account of the event. This direct perspective can provide valuable insights and details that may not be present in secondary sources.