I will use a, b, and c, instead of c1, c2 and c3
a(3,3,-1) + b(1,2,-3) + c(-11,-13,9) = (0,0,0)
3a + 2b - 11c = 0
3a + 2b - 13c = 0
-a - 3b + 9c = 0
subtract 2nd from 1st
2c = 0
c = 0
sub into 2nd and 3rd
3a + 2b = 0
-a - 3b = 0
triple the 3rd:
-3a - 9b = 0
3a + 2b = 0
-7b = 0
b = 0
clearly also a = 0
so it looks like the trivial case, that is
c1=0
c2=0
c3=0 is the only case that works,
so for your question, since you don't want the all zero case, no
there is no other solution
If possible, find an example of actual numbers c1, c2, and c3, not all zero, so that the following is true.
c1[3,3,−1]
+ c2[1,2,−3]
+ c3[−11,−13,9]
= [0,0,0]
6 answers
I am going to call c1 = a
c2 = b
c2 = c
+3a + 1b -11c = 0
+3a + 2b -13c = 0
-1a - 3b + 9c = 0
-b+2c = 0 from first 2 so b = 2 c
+3a + 2b -13c = 0
-3a - 9b +27c = 0 from second 2
--->
-7 b + 14 c = 0
so
-7(2c) = -14 c
c = anything at all
In your linear algebra using Cramer's method
You can get a finite determinant for your coefficient matrix
HOWEVER when you plug in the numerator matrix with a column of zeros, you always get 0 in the numerator.
c2 = b
c2 = c
+3a + 1b -11c = 0
+3a + 2b -13c = 0
-1a - 3b + 9c = 0
-b+2c = 0 from first 2 so b = 2 c
+3a + 2b -13c = 0
-3a - 9b +27c = 0 from second 2
--->
-7 b + 14 c = 0
so
-7(2c) = -14 c
c = anything at all
In your linear algebra using Cramer's method
You can get a finite determinant for your coefficient matrix
HOWEVER when you plug in the numerator matrix with a column of zeros, you always get 0 in the numerator.
well, we agree this time :)
and we both called the variables a, b, and c
What's that old saying, something about great minds, lol
What's that old saying, something about great minds, lol
EXAMLE 75@:~5@_2_3_2(_3)
what is 75@<5_2_3_2(_3)