You might also consider this definition and think about "permissiveness."
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overtolerance
If global peace created freedom how would over-tolerrance be a problem?
People wouldn't be able to voice their own opinions because they might offend someone else.
5 answers
How can I expand on this? I need to add about four more sentences. Any help would be appreciated.
People would not be able to take ascendancy of the right of tolerance and the freedom to deliberate and practice primordial beliefs. Because in turn may end up frustrating the similar right to tolerance of other individuals and cliques.
People would not be able to take ascendancy of the right of tolerance and the freedom to deliberate and practice primordial beliefs. Because in turn may end up frustrating the similar right to tolerance of other individuals and cliques.
Do you understand that quote? What does it mean in your own words?
Did you think about permissiveness?
Did you think about permissiveness?
It means that individuals can not take advantage of tolerance because whatever they say might offend someone else who has a different viewpoint about whatever was said. I did think about permissiveness it's a good word and means pretty much the same as over tolerrance but I don't know how that would be a problem with individuals freedom.
Permissiveness implies being tolerant of behavior that may harm others.