If all counties in Florida had used the same procedures for recounting votes in the 2000 presidential election, then how might that have affected the outcome of Bush v. Gore?

Question

A. The ruling may have changed because the procedure that most of the counties used was unconstitutional.
B. The ruling may have changed because the different procedures for recounting votes between counties violated voters' constitutional rights.
C. The ruling probably would stay the same because the act of recounting was in and of itself unconstitutional.
D. The ruling probably would stay the same because using different procedures for recounting between counties was consistent with the Constitution.

I think the answer is B

Answer 1

True.

Answer 2

I believe it is B I may be wrong