If a party can show that a certain piece of potential evidence is relevant to an issue in dispute, that evidence will always be admissible.

A.
Correct. Relevance is the foremost important requirement for the admission of evidence. No other considerations are necessary.

B.
Only if it can also be shown that there is no reason in law that the potential evidence must be rejected by court.

C.
No, relevance is only one of three requirements for the admission of evidence. The evidence must also be credible and reliable.

D.
Yes, relevant evidence will be admitted. If there are any reason to challenge the evidence, the burden rests on the opposing party to cross-examine the witness or adduce opposing evidence.

E.
A and D above.

F.
All of the above.

1 points

1 answer

E.
A and D above.
Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. Evaluating Evidence Quick Check3 of 33 of 3 Items Question Which piece of evidence would be relevant to the claim "Mulligan's
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions