Asked by Erin
I just cannot seem to be able to grasp the concept of solving polynomial inequalities. Can someone please explain, step by step, how to solve them? Here's a problem I can't solve. Please use this as an example:
(x-2)(x-5)<0
I cannot thank you enough for helping me with this. I have a test on this tomorrow and this is the only section I don't get. Thank you for all the help!
(x-2)(x-5)<0
I cannot thank you enough for helping me with this. I have a test on this tomorrow and this is the only section I don't get. Thank you for all the help!
Answers
Answered by
Damon
First of all, sketch a graph of
y = (x-2)(x-5)
This will be a parabola because it is a quadratic, a x^2 + b x + c
for large negative x, y is big positive
it is zero at x = 2
then it is negative for a while
it is then zero at x = 5
then it goes big positive
so
negative between x = 2 and x = 5
y = (x-2)(x-5)
This will be a parabola because it is a quadratic, a x^2 + b x + c
for large negative x, y is big positive
it is zero at x = 2
then it is negative for a while
it is then zero at x = 5
then it goes big positive
so
negative between x = 2 and x = 5
Answered by
Erin
Thank you so much, Damon! You really helped me out! : )
Answered by
Reiny
I used to teach it with a slightly different approach because it worked well with multiple factors.
for example I will add another factor to your problem
(x-2)(x-5)(x+2) > 0
the x-intercepts of the corresponding function would be x = -2,2, and 5
mark those on the x-axis
there are now 4 sections to my x-axis
1. all values below -2
2. all values between -2 and 2
3. all values between 2 and 5
4. all values greater than 5
now pick an arbitrary value in each section and test it. You don't have to actually evaluate it, just worry about + or - (matching the > or <)
1. let x=-5 ---- (-)(-)(-) = - (does not work)
2. let x = 0 ---(-)(-)(+) = + works
3. let x = 3 ---(+)(-)(+) = - no
4. let x = 6 --- (+)(+)(+) = + yes
so -2 < x < 2 OR x > 5
for quadratic inequalities, I would also use the method outlined by Damon, but for cubics and higher, the above method works very nicely.
Of course if the function does not factor it would be a mess anyway.
for example I will add another factor to your problem
(x-2)(x-5)(x+2) > 0
the x-intercepts of the corresponding function would be x = -2,2, and 5
mark those on the x-axis
there are now 4 sections to my x-axis
1. all values below -2
2. all values between -2 and 2
3. all values between 2 and 5
4. all values greater than 5
now pick an arbitrary value in each section and test it. You don't have to actually evaluate it, just worry about + or - (matching the > or <)
1. let x=-5 ---- (-)(-)(-) = - (does not work)
2. let x = 0 ---(-)(-)(+) = + works
3. let x = 3 ---(+)(-)(+) = - no
4. let x = 6 --- (+)(+)(+) = + yes
so -2 < x < 2 OR x > 5
for quadratic inequalities, I would also use the method outlined by Damon, but for cubics and higher, the above method works very nicely.
Of course if the function does not factor it would be a mess anyway.
Answered by
Erin
Thank you, Reiny. My teacher taught me something very similar to your method and now I understand it. Thank you for your help! : )
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.