I have been working on the Type I error and a Type II error problem but now I can not figure out the Power of the test?
A manufacturer of computer monitors receives shipments of LCD panels from a suppliers overseas. It is not cost effective to inspect each LCD panel for defeats, so a sample is taken from each shipment. A significance test is conducted to determine whether the proportion of defective LCD panels is greater then the acceptable limit of 1%. If it is, the shipment will be taken back to the supplier. The hypothesis for this test is Ho:p=0.01 and Ha:p>0.01, where p is the true proportion of defective panels in the shipment.
If a Type I error were to be committed, we would conclude that there are more the 1% defective panels when there really not. The shipment would be returned when it was not authorized. If a Type II error were not committed, we would conclude that there are no more than 1% of defected panels when there really were. Then defective panels would be accepted from the supplier.
The supplier would think that the Type I error is more serious because they would be receiving LCD panels back that work fine. The computer monitor manufacturer would think that the Type II error is more serious because they would be receiving panels of poor quality.
What would the Power of the test be?
1 answer
I hope this will help.