Asked by Anonymous
I am suppose to simplify the following problems:
sqrt(x)/x
(isn't that already simplified?)
e^(1+lnx)
(I have no clue.)
ln(1/2)
(I know this problem translates--> e^x=1/2--> but how would you solve it w/o a calculator?)
e^(3lnx)
([e^(lnx^3)]--> is it equal to 3?)
<b>sqrt(x)/x
(isn't that already simplified?)</b>
I agree with you.
you could do this: x^(1/2)/x
= x(-1/2)
= 1/√x but that is certainly not simpler.
<b>e^(1+lnx)
(I have no clue.) </b>
e^(1+lnx)
=(e)(e^lnx)
=e(x) = ex
<b>n(1/2)
(I know this problem translates--> e^x=1/2--> but how would you solve it w/o a calculator?) </b>
ln(1/2)
= ln 1 - ln 2
= 0 - ln 2
= -ln 2
<b> e^(3lnx)
([e^(lnx^3)]--> is it equal to 3?)</b>
yes, based on the fact that a^(log<sub>a</sub> k = k
sqrt(x)/x
(isn't that already simplified?)
e^(1+lnx)
(I have no clue.)
ln(1/2)
(I know this problem translates--> e^x=1/2--> but how would you solve it w/o a calculator?)
e^(3lnx)
([e^(lnx^3)]--> is it equal to 3?)
<b>sqrt(x)/x
(isn't that already simplified?)</b>
I agree with you.
you could do this: x^(1/2)/x
= x(-1/2)
= 1/√x but that is certainly not simpler.
<b>e^(1+lnx)
(I have no clue.) </b>
e^(1+lnx)
=(e)(e^lnx)
=e(x) = ex
<b>n(1/2)
(I know this problem translates--> e^x=1/2--> but how would you solve it w/o a calculator?) </b>
ln(1/2)
= ln 1 - ln 2
= 0 - ln 2
= -ln 2
<b> e^(3lnx)
([e^(lnx^3)]--> is it equal to 3?)</b>
yes, based on the fact that a^(log<sub>a</sub> k = k
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.