To model the equation \(-x + 40 = x\), we will analyze each response option provided to find the best real-world problem that fits the equation.
-
The number of days that the temperature has been below zero is 40 fewer than the number of days the temperature has been above zero.
- In this case, let \( x \) represent the number of days above zero. Then, the number of days below zero would be \( -x + 40 \). The equation represents that the days below zero are 40 fewer than those above zero, which aligns perfectly with our equation.
-
The amount of money a stock lost in the stock market was $40 more than it gained.
- Here, if we let \( x \) be the amount gained, the loss would be \( x + 40 \); however, this doesn't correspond to our equation.
-
If Alex gained as much money as she lost, she would have 40 dollars.
- This statement concerning Alex's gains and losses does not directly translate to the given equation.
-
Marsha is below sea level. To get as far above sea level as she is below, she would have to move to a location 40 feet higher.
- This scenario can be described mathematically, but it does not translate directly to our equation.
Given this analysis, the best option that correctly models the equation \(-x + 40 = x\) is:
The number of days that the temperature has been below zero is 40 fewer than the number of days the temperature has been above zero.