The correct response is:
Translation of (2,0) and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
How would you describe this series of transformations?(1 point)
Responses
Translation of (2,0) and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
Translation of left parenthesis 2 comma 0 right parenthesis and then reflection across the x -axis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .
Reflection across the y-axis and then a translation of (−3,−5) shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
Reflection across the y -axis and then a translation of left parenthesis negative 3 comma negative 5 right parenthesis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .
Rotation of 90 degrees clockwise and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
Rotation of 90 degrees clockwise and then reflection across the x -axis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .
Since triangles ABC and A′′B"C" do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent.
Since triangles upper A upper B upper C and upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent.
Skip to navigation
1 answer