Samuel A. Worcester would most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people with disappointment because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land. Worcester was an advocate for the rights of Native Americans and, in the case Worcester v. Georgia, he supported the Cherokee's sovereignty and legal rights to their territory. Ultimately, despite his efforts and the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the Cherokee Nation, the federal government and the state of Georgia continued to pursue Indian Removal.
How would Samuel A. Worcester most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people? (1 point) Responses He would be happy because he wanted the Cherokee to be moved to the west. He would be happy because he wanted the Cherokee to be moved to the west. He would be surprised because he expected the Supreme Court to rule in his favor. He would be surprised because he expected the Supreme Court to rule in his favor. He would be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land. He would be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokees' right to their land. He would be surprised because he expected Georgians to change their minds about Indian Removal. He would be surprised because he expected Georgians to change their minds about Indian Removal.
1 answer