How the characters and events of "flowers for algernon" are similar to the characters and events of "the excerpts from fankenstien

1 answer

"Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes and Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" share several thematic and conceptual similarities, particularly concerning the exploration of human nature, the consequences of intellectual enhancement, and the ethical implications of scientific advancement. Here’s a comparison of characters and events in both works:

Characters:

  1. Charlie Gordon (Flowers for Algernon) and Victor Frankenstein (Frankenstein):

    • Charlie Gordon: Charlie is a mentally disabled man who undergoes an experimental surgery to increase his intelligence. His journey raises questions about identity, the nature of intelligence, and what it means to be human.
    • Victor Frankenstein: Victor is a scientist who seeks to transcend natural boundaries by creating life. His pursuit of knowledge leads to catastrophic outcomes, prompting him to face the ethical implications of his scientific quest.
  2. Algernon (Flowers for Algernon) and the Creature (Frankenstein):

    • Algernon: The mouse used in the experiments that enhance Charlie's intelligence represents the initial success of scientific experimentation. His decline after achieving enhanced intelligence serves as a pivotal moment in the narrative.
    • The Creature: Frankenstein's creation, often referred to simply as the Creature, embodies the consequences of unchecked ambition and human hubris. He grapples with his identity, loneliness, and societal rejection, paralleling Algernon's decline.
  3. Dr. Strauss and Dr. Frankenstein:

    • Dr. Strauss: In "Flowers for Algernon," he represents the scientific authority who controls Charlie’s experiment, raising ethical questions about manipulating human intelligence without considering the emotional ramifications.
    • Dr. Frankenstein: As the archetypal mad scientist, he embodies the dangers of playing God and highlights the tragic outcomes of his pursuit of knowledge without moral consideration.

Events:

  1. Scientific Experimentation:

    • In both texts, central events revolve around the pursuit of knowledge through experimental means. Charlie undergoes an operation to enhance his intelligence, while Victor creates life through the reanimation of dead tissue. Both characters encounter unforeseen consequences that highlight the ethical dilemmas of their scientific endeavors.
  2. The Rise and Fall of Intelligence:

    • Charlie’s rapid advancement in intelligence leads to alienation and a loss of innocence, reflecting the transient nature of his experience. Similarly, the Creature, after gaining knowledge and insight, becomes aware of his isolation and suffering, leading to despair. Both arcs emphasize the fragile nature of happiness linked to intellectual advancement.
  3. Consequences of Isolation:

    • Charlie experiences profound isolation as his intelligence surpasses those around him, reflecting a similar fate for the Creature, who becomes increasingly isolated due to his grotesque appearance and societal rejection. Both narratives explore how enhanced intelligence or unnatural creation can lead to solitude and tragedy.
  4. Tragic Endings:

    • Both stories culminate in tragic outcomes: Charlie’s intelligence eventually regresses, leading him back to his former state, while the Creature’s tragedy unfolds as he confronts his creator and his own irreconcilable existence. These endings serve as cautionary tales about the consequences of unbridled scientific ambition and the inherent human need for connection.

Themes:

Both "Flowers for Algernon" and "Frankenstein" delve into the complexities of human emotion, the ethical boundaries of science, and the quest for identity. They warn against the hubris associated with attempting to transcend human limitations and emphasize the importance of empathy, connection, and the responsibilities that come with knowledge and power.

In summary, though the stories differ in detail and context, the overarching themes of intellectual enhancement, isolation, and the moral consequences of scientific experimentation forge significant parallels between the characters and events of Keyes’ and Shelley’s works.