How might a geographer summarize and interpret spatial data from a GIS displaying data about the frequency and distribution of forest fires?(1 point)

Question

Responses

A geographer would be able to explain how forest fires are started and, therefore, how to prevent them.
A geographer would be able to explain how forest fires are started and, therefore, how to prevent them.

A geographer would be able to analyze the size of forest fires and the impacts those fires have on rural communities
A geographer would be able to analyze the size of forest fires and the impacts those fires have on rural communities

A geographer would be able to evaluate the relationship between forest fires and drought conditions.
A geographer would be able to evaluate the relationship between forest fires and drought conditions.

A geographer would be able to describe locations where forest fires are most common and analyze which places might be more prone to fires in the future
A geographer would be able to describe locations where forest fires are most common and analyze which places might be more prone to fires in the future
Question 2
2. Why would a geographer decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map?(1 point)
Responses

A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quantitative data in the form of percentages
A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented was quantitative data in the form of percentages

A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the information being represented stayed consistent across similar locations and changed gradually over different distances.

A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually
A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had discrete units which could be represented individually

A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.
A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.

Answer 1

Question 1

A geographer might summarize and interpret spatial data from a GIS displaying data about the frequency and distribution of forest fires with the following response:

A geographer would be able to describe locations where forest fires are most common and analyze which places might be more prone to fires in the future.
This response emphasizes the ability to categorize and assess both current and future vulnerability to forest fires based on geographic patterns and data.

Question 2

A geographer would decide to use a proportional symbol map over a dot density map for the following reason:

A proportional symbol map would be better if the subject being studied had varying sizes and intensities.
This response highlights the effectiveness of proportional symbol maps in representing data that varies in magnitude, allowing for a clearer visualization of differences in intensity or quantity across a geographic area.