Ask a New Question
Menu

How have humans negatively impacted the water system of Arkansas? select all that apply.

1. The construction of the MKARNS has resulted in more flooding.
2. Chemicals and runoffs from industry harm wildlife.
3. Too much trade along the rivers damages the banks.
4. Sediment from hydroelectric dams can pollute waters

5 answers

Humans have negatively impacted the water system of Arkansas in several ways. From the options provided, the following apply:

  1. Chemicals and runoffs from industry harm wildlife.
  2. Too much trade along the rivers damages the banks.
  3. Sediment from hydroelectric dams can pollute waters.

While option 1 may have some validity, it is less straightforward, as the MKARNS (McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System) was primarily built to manage water levels for navigation and flood control, though it could have potential implications for flooding in certain contexts. However, the other options clearly indicate negative impacts.

you only can choose two

If I can only choose two options that represent negative impacts on the water system of Arkansas, I would select:

  1. Chemicals and runoffs from industry harm wildlife.
  2. Sediment from hydroelectric dams can pollute waters.

These choices directly address well-documented environmental concerns related to water quality and ecosystem health.

are you sure can you explain it

Certainly! Let’s break down the options in terms of their impacts on the water system of Arkansas:

  1. The construction of the MKARNS has resulted in more flooding.
    While the MKARNS was constructed to help manage water levels for navigation and flood control, there are arguments about its effects. However, it is primarily designed to help mitigate flooding, so this option might not represent a negative impact as clearly as the others.

  2. Chemicals and runoffs from industry harm wildlife.
    This is a well-documented issue. Industrial runoff can introduce harmful chemicals into water bodies, affecting both the water quality and aquatic life. This option touches on pollution that can have long-lasting effects on ecosystems and biodiversity.

  3. Too much trade along the rivers damages the banks.
    Increased trade and associated activities can lead to bank erosion and habitat destruction. While this option is valid, it might be less direct in terms of widespread environmental degradation compared to chemical pollution.

  4. Sediment from hydroelectric dams can pollute waters.
    This is a serious concern since sediment can carry pollutants and disrupt natural water systems and habitats. Additionally, the presence of dams alters the natural flow of rivers and can affect sediment transport downstream, which can impact water quality and aquatic ecosystems.

Given these explanations, if forced to choose two negative impacts specifically for their direct and well-documented effects on the water system, I would maintain that options 2 and 4 are the most representative choices, as they highlight critical environmental concerns associated with water pollution and its effects on wildlife and ecosystems.

If you need further clarification or wish to discuss specific impacts further, please let me know!