To determine how the sentence supports the author's purpose, we need to understand the context of the author's overall argument or thesis. Here’s a brief interpretation of each option based on common purposes in historical writing about colonies:
a. It describes a reason that the English settled in Georgia.
If the sentence provides a specific motivation for the English settlement in Georgia, such as economic opportunity, land availability, or strategic location, then this would clearly support the author’s purpose of explaining why Georgia was established.
b. It shows that English colonies answered to the King.
If the sentence illustrates the hierarchical structure of English colonial governance, this option would support a purpose centered around the political dynamics of the colonies and their relation to British authority.
c. It shows that Georgia needed to defend itself.
If the sentence touches on threats to Georgia and the need for defense (perhaps against Spanish Florida or Native American tribes), this would support an argument about the reasons for Georgia’s founding as a strategic or defensive measure.
d. It does not support the author’s purpose.
If the sentence fails to connect to the main themes or arguments presented in the text, then it would not support the author's purpose.
To choose the best option, you would evaluate the specific sentence in question and how it aligns with the main points the author is making. If you can provide the actual sentence or additional context, I could help you analyze it more specifically!
1 answer