How does the style of claim 1 engage the audience in a way that the style of claim 2 does not?

Question

(1 point)
Responses

Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience.
Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience.

Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way.
Claim 1 uses informal and subjective language to appeal to the audience in a personal and conversational way.

Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience.
Claim 1 explains some benefits of outdoor time in order to gain support from its audience.

Claim 1 uses formal and objective language to convey factual details to the audience.

Answer 1

Claim 1 explains how research supports its claim in order to convey authority to its audience.

This style engages the audience by presenting credible and reliable evidence, which can enhance the audience's trust and confidence in the argument being made. By grounding the claim in research, it demonstrates a well-thought-out position, encouraging the audience to consider the information seriously and fostering a sense of connection through shared understanding of factual data.

In contrast, Claim 2 does not build authority in a similar way; it may lack the same level of engagement since it does not utilize research or evidence to support its argument. Therefore, it may not resonate as strongly, potentially leading to skepticism or disinterest from the audience.