How does the interaction of environment and culture differ between North Kivu and Gatlinburg?(1 point)
Responses
In Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment. In North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption.
In Gatlinburg, the culture has benefited from the environment. In North Kivu, the natural environment has contributed to a culture of violence and corruption.
Gatlinburg’s culture is a result of overcoming the natural environment. North Kivu’s culture has been damaged by the natural environment.
Gatlinburg’s culture is a result of overcoming the natural environment. North Kivu’s culture has been damaged by the natural environment.
The lack of valuable natural resources in North Kivu has created poverty. The wealth of natural resources in Gatlinburg has benefited the society.
The lack of valuable natural resources in North Kivu has created poverty. The wealth of natural resources in Gatlinburg has benefited the society.
In Gatlinburg, culture is based on acquiring valuable minerals. In North Kivu, the valuable minerals are being taken away from the region.
7 answers
Responses
A. People are buying fewer warm clothes in Kiribati.
B. Fewer people find jobs as petroleum workers in Texas because of depleted reserves.
C. In India beef is not sold in grocery stores.
D. Grocery stores in some parts of India are beginning to sell beef.
Responses