The inclusion of Dr. John Black’s perspective in paragraphs 4-5 effectively shows that the author acknowledges the benefits of helmet use for an individual who gets into an accident. Dr. Black’s viewpoint likely adds credibility to the argument by presenting an expert's opinion on how helmets can provide protection in certain situations. However, the complexity of the topic is highlighted, indicating that while helmets may be beneficial during accidents, the author may also explore potential downsides or other factors influencing overall cycling safety. This nuanced approach strengthens the author's argument by recognizing both the advantages of helmet use and the need for a broader understanding of cycling safety.
How does the inclusion of Dr. John Black’s perspective in paragraphs 4-5 develop the author’s argument about helmet use while cycling?
Responses
It implies that helmet use is beneficial in some circumstances and harmful in others.
It implies that helmet use is beneficial in some circumstances and harmful in others.
It conveys that the author is skeptical about stories of serious injury due to lack of helmet use.
It conveys that the author is skeptical about stories of serious injury due to lack of helmet use.
It demonstrates that most doctors do not understand the risk that helmet use poses to a cyclist in an accident.
It demonstrates that most doctors do not understand the risk that helmet use poses to a cyclist in an accident.
It shows that the author acknowledges the benefits of helmet use for an individual who gets into an accident.
5 answers
Text is “The Bike Helmet Debate”
by Peter Walker
by Peter Walker
In "The Bike Helmet Debate" by Peter Walker, the inclusion of Dr. John Black’s perspective in paragraphs 4-5 develops the author's argument by acknowledging the complexity surrounding helmet use while cycling. Dr. Black likely provides insights into the benefits of wearing a helmet in the event of an accident, which serves to reinforce the argument that helmets can offer protection. However, Walker may also present nuances about circumstances in which helmet use might not always lead to the desired safety outcomes or could even pose risks.
By bringing in Dr. Black's perspective, Walker enhances the discussion around helmet use by framing it in a context that considers both the potential benefits and the limitations or challenges associated with helmets. This multifaceted view contributes to a more balanced understanding of the debate, emphasizing that while helmets are important for individual safety in certain scenarios, the broader implications for cycling culture, behavior, and overall safety should also be considered. Thus, the author's argument is developed by providing a more comprehensive look at the issues surrounding helmet use in cycling.
If you have specific excerpts or points you'd like to explore further, please provide them, and I can help tailor the analysis more precisely!
Answer?
The inclusion of Dr. John Black’s perspective in paragraphs 4-5 develops the author's argument about helmet use while cycling by showing that the author acknowledges the benefits of helmet use for an individual who gets into an accident. Dr. Black's insights likely reinforce the idea that helmets can provide essential protection, thus enhancing the argument that while helmet use has advantages, it is important to consider the broader context of cycling safety as well.
1 answer