The overall validity of the author's claim is best supported by using various types of evidence to outline the reasons why people with disabilities can pursue scientific professions but changes to the profession need to be made. This response contributes to the claim by presenting a comprehensive view that not only acknowledges the potential of individuals with disabilities in scientific fields but also identifies necessary adaptations to create an inclusive environment. This multifaceted approach strengthens the argument by highlighting both capability and the need for reform.
How does the first section contribute to the overall validity of the author’s claim?
(1 point)
Responses

by using various types of evidence to outline the reasons why people with disabilities can pursue scientific professions but changes to the profession need to be made
by using various types of evidence to outline the reasons why people with disabilities can pursue scientific professions but changes to the profession need to be made

by detailing a specific case study to show how accessibility accommodations help individual careers as well as the scientific community as a whole
by detailing a specific case study to show how accessibility accommodations help individual careers as well as the scientific community as a whole

by using a personal anecdote to outline examples of specific challenges people with disabilities face as a way to emphasize the need for solutions
by using a personal anecdote to outline examples of specific challenges people with disabilities face as a way to emphasize the need for solutions

by providing background information about a particular person to highlight the unique contributions people with disabilities make to science
1 answer