How does the development of maritime empires compare with the development of land-based empires in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The maritime empires found themselves bankrupt due to the necessary investment in infrastructure.
The maritime empires found themselves bankrupt due to the necessary investment in infrastructure.

Land-based empires were heavily supported by private individuals and joint-stock companies.
Land-based empires were heavily supported by private individuals and joint-stock companies.

The maritime empires focused on control of trade routes in the Indian Ocean rather than the control of people and land.
The maritime empires focused on control of trade routes in the Indian Ocean rather than the control of people and land.

The maritime empires did not have to rely on locals for help in the Indian Ocean.
The maritime empires did not have to rely on locals for help in the Indian Ocean.

Answer 1

The most accurate comparison regarding the development of maritime empires versus land-based empires in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries is:

The maritime empires focused on control of trade routes in the Indian Ocean rather than the control of people and land.

Maritime empires, such as those established by Spain, Portugal, and later the Dutch and British, primarily sought to control key trade routes and establish trade networks. Their focus was on commerce, trade based on shipping, and the establishment of strategic ports. In contrast, land-based empires, such as the Ottoman Empire or the Mughal Empire, were more focused on territorial expansion and control over large land areas and the people within them.