How does the definition of a tyrant addressed by Plato and Aristotle differ from the term used in modern political systems?(1 point) Responses Tyrants were considered to be the ideal rulers in Greek city-states. Tyrants were considered to be the ideal rulers in Greek city-states. Tyrants often helped improve living situations for their citizens. Tyrants often helped improve living situations for their citizens. Tyrants followed the rule of law once they gained power. Tyrants followed the rule of law once they gained power. Tyrants legitimately gained power through the election process.

Answer 1

The definition of a tyrant in the context of Plato and Aristotle differs significantly from the modern understanding of the term. In ancient Greek thought, a tyrant was often someone who seized power unconstitutionally, but they might have been viewed as capable of improving the situation of their citizens or enacting beneficial reforms. In contrast, in modern political systems, a "tyrant" is typically associated with oppressive rule, arbitrary power, and the violation of rights, often characterized by dictatorial governance without regard for law or the consent of the governed.

Of the responses you provided, one could argue that "Tyrants often helped improve living situations for their citizens" aligns more with the ancient perspective. However, this notion does not necessarily reflect the definition commonly used in contemporary discourse, where "tyranny" implies abuse of power and oppression rather than positive reforms.