To compare the authors' use of language in the specified paragraphs of "Cameras in the Courtroom" and "Challenging the Status Quo," we can analyze how each phrase contributes to the overall tone.
-
"Supported the ban" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" conveys a pleased tone because it suggests agreement and endorsement of the decision to restrict cameras. This phrasing implies satisfaction with the measures taken to maintain a specific judicial atmosphere.
-
"Stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo" contributes to a frustrated tone as it carries a sense of annoyance or impatience towards those who resist change. The phrase implies stagnation and a reluctance to evolve, highlighting a tension between progress and traditionalism.
-
"Defendants would get nervous" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" expresses a concerned tone since it suggests empathy for the defendants' emotional state and the potential negative impacts of cameras on their ability to engage in the legal process comfortably.
-
"A closed loop" in "Challenging the Status Quo" indicates an explanatory tone, as it seeks to clarify a concept or state a situation that might be limiting or confining. It can imply that the established methods are insular and self-perpetuating, making the argument more analytical.
-
"Jurors would be distracted" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" contributes to a scornful tone, as it suggests a derision towards the notion that cameras could interfere with the jury's duty to focus on the case. This phrase carries an implication that those in favor of cameras lack awareness of the potential consequences.
-
"Everyone should be" in "Challenging the Status Quo" may suggest an arrogant tone because it implies that there is a singular correct viewpoint that others must align with, asserting a moral high ground.
-
"All these factors" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" develops an analytical tone, as it signals that the author is considering multiple elements that influence the situation, presenting a methodical examination of the issues.
-
"Better way of functioning" in "Challenging the Status Quo" builds a hopeful tone as it suggests improvement and progress, indicating a desire for change that leads to more effective outcomes.
In summary, the use of language in the two articles creates different tones: "Cameras in the Courtroom" tends towards a concerned, analytical, or pleased approach regarding the issues around courtroom cameras, while "Challenging the Status Quo" leans into frustration, arrogance, and hopefulness concerning resistance to change. Each phrase effectively conveys distinct emotions aligned with the authors' perspectives.
1 answer